The regulations require an applicant to link with the Health Board (HB) as part of pre-application process. The applicant and officers from the HB normally arrange a meeting. The HB officers provide help on regulation and process but they do not and cannot give a view on whether a proposal might be subsequently approved. Existing pharmacies may also need to follow the same process when looking to relocate to different premises.
Before the meeting, the applicant provides details about the proposed pharmacy address, services to be provided and opening hours, which allows discussion on how a new pharmacy in the area might address any unmet needs or improve local patient services.
This discussion is to help the applicant to decide whether to move forward with their proposal. If their decision is to move forward, another meeting is arranged to discuss the Joint Consultation exercise.
The joint public consultation exercise is led by the Health Board (HB) working with the applicant. It invites the views of residents and other interested people and organisations within the area where the proposed premises are located and measures their support for the opening of a new pharmacy at this address.
The exercise must invite views on the following issues:
The pharmacy services the applicant wants to provide;
Views about gaps in the current pharmacy services available;
How the new pharmacy might impact on current NHS services within the identified local area;
The level of support (or not) for the application.
New pharmacy consultations must be advertised in the newspaper with the highest circulation within the local area.
Where an existing pharmacy wants to relocate a poster will be displayed in the current pharmacy premises.
The advert and/or poster will let you know how you can take part in the consultation. Normally this will be by completing an electronic questionnaire which you can access through the HB’s website. The link to this questionnaire will appear clearly in the advert and/or poster.
If you do not have access to a computer, a paper version of the questionnaire will be also available. For those who need it, the questionnaire will be available in large font, Braille and other languages. Detail on how to get a paper questionnaire will appear clearly in the advert and/or poster.
General comments are also welcomed and details on how to do this will appear clearly in the advert and/or poster.
The HB also writes to the following to get a community view:
Elected representatives for the area where the proposed pharmacy is located (local councillors, MSPs, and MPs);
Health & Social Care Partnership Local Engagement Network;
the Community Council(s) serving the area where the proposed pharmacy is located; and
Voluntary and 3rd Sector organisations located in or providing services to people living within the area surrounding the proposed premises.
The public consultation lasts for 90 working days (does not include weekends & public holidays) and all responses received by the end of this period are included within the Consultation Analysis Report (CAR). This report details the extent of the consultation and summarises all the replies received.
The purpose of the Health Board’s Pharmaceutical Care Services Plan is to provide additional information on services currently available.
When fully developed the plan should identify if there are any localities within the Health Board where pharmacy services might need to be improved. The Board is unable to analyse current health data sufficiently to be able to make this statement currently.
Mr Andrew McMurdo & Ms Lisa Fergusson – 1 Fountainwell Square, K.A.T.S. Building, Glasgow G1 1RB
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st October 2014.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood was currently inadequate. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood.
Mr Asgher Mohammed – Unit 4, 170 High Street, Glasgow G1 1QL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th December 2006.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of additional pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Boots the Chemist – Dundas Street, Queen Street Station, Glasgow G1 2AF
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 17th April 2003
That the granting of the application was desirable, though not necessary, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Queen Street Station, Dundas Street, Glasgow, G1 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th November 2003.
That the granting of the application was desirable, though not necessary, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Queen Street Station, Dundas Street, Glasgow, G1 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Lloydspharmacy Ltd – Unit 3, 130 Gallowgate, Glasgow G1 5AE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th June 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 11th December 2012.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served. The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Rajinder Singh, 81 St George’s Road, Glasgow G3 6JA
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 81 St George’s Road, Charing Cross, Glasgow, G3 6JA for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused. The Committee noted there existed an adequate pharmaceutical service within the area, with three pharmacies located in the defined neighbourhood and fourteen within a one mile radius. The Committee noted that the pharmacies located in the defined neighbourhood offered Supervised Methadone Administration Scheme, Domiciliary Oxygen Therapy and Advice to Nursing Home services and that the overall level of service provide by pharmacies was already adequate.
Mr Gazenfer Ali of Vitalis Healthcare Ltd, 59 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6QX
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th September 2012.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served. The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Gazenfer Ali of Vitalis Healthcare Ltd, 59 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6QX
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 3rd June 2013.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served. There was room for improvement in the marketing and communication of the availability of translation services, which was being addressed, but the service was there and was being provided.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Ms Farzana Rasool & Mr Aziz Rasool, 111 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6RU
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th April 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision.
Ms Farzana Rasool & Mr Aziz Rasool, 111 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6RU
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 16th October 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision.
Ms Farzana Rasool & Mr Aziz Rasool, 111 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6RU
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st September 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances. it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th September 2002.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 1066 Argyle Street, Glasgow G3.8 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Apple Healthcare Group, 1056 Argyle Street, Glasgow G3 8LY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th February 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 1056 Argyle Street, Glasgow G3.8 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Lisa Christie – LG Pharmacy Ltd, Unit 12, 19 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 2nd May 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
The PPC agreed to postpone consideration of the application from Mr A Manzoor and Ms Amina al-Adhami until the National Appeals Panel had made a determination on LG Pharmacy Ltd’s application.
Mr A Manzoor & Ms Amina Al-Adhami – 5/7 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 16th October 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Lisa Christie – LG Pharmacy Ltd, Unit 12, 19 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 26th February 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Ian Robert Mouat – 11 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 16th December 2009
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Ms Humyra Ahmed & Mr Ahmed Manzoor – 5/7 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th August 2017.
In considering the application, the Committee took account of all relevant factors concerning neighbourhood and adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located, in terms of Regulation 5(10).
It also took account of all information available to it, which was relevant to the application. For the reasons set out in the minute, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood was adequate, given the level of service currently being provided by existing pharmacy contractors located outwith the neighbourhood. It was therefore neither necessary nor desirable to grant the application. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
Ms Tajinderjit K Sandhu – Unit 12, 42-46, New City Road, New City Road, Glasgow G4 9JT
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th October 2000
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Unit 12, 42-44 New City Road, Glasgow G4.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Dr Saduf Riaz of Premichem Pharmacy Ltd – Untit E, Morrison Street, Kingston Quay, Glasgow G5
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 8th August 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Houlihan Pharmacy Ltd – Unit 2, Block 0, 34 Elmfoot Grove, Oatlands, Glasgow G5 0LR
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 28th September 2019.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out in the minute, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10.7-10.11 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Ramis Qureshi – Unit 476, 32 Elmfoot Grove, Oatlands, Glasgow, G5 0LR
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th November 2024.
Taking account of all the representations made, and the information revealed by the CAR and submitted orally and in writing the Committee determines that it is neither necessary nor desirable to approve the application by Ramis Qureshi for admission to the Pharmaceutical List.
Mr Ameen Mohammed & Mr Rashid Mohammed – 460 Ballater Street, Glasgow G5 0QW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th January 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the majority decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Ameen – 460 Ballater Street, Glasgow G5 0QW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th April 2012.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Mr Ameen Mohammed – 460 Ballater Street, Glasgow G5 0QW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 28th November 2012.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeal Panel Decision, remitted back to the Board.
Mr Ameen Mohammed – 460 Ballater Street, Glasgow G5 0QW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th September 2013.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set in the minute, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Mr C M Razwan Shafi – 34 Bridge Street, Glasgow G5 9HU
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st February 2005.
The Committee agreed that the granting of the application was not necessary. A majority decision by the Committee members agreed that the granting of the application was highly desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 34 Bridge Street, Glasgow, G5 9HU for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Dr Saduf Riaz of Premichem Pharmacy Ltd – 151 Oxford Street, Glasgow G5 9JE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th March 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 15th February 2001.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Mr Patrick Gilbride – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 15th February 2001.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Mr John Gilbride – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th September 2001.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr John Gilbride – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st November 2002.
That decision on the application be deferred, and an oral hearing arranged. Additionally, that further supplementary information be made available to the Committee for their next meeting.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the majority decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Ms Suman Barhaya – 672 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 672 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Ameen – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 29th March 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th January 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Mr Adill Sheikh of Albert Cross Ltd – 672 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 2nd April 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Ameen – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 26th March 2009.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Mrs Carol F Anderson (T/A L B Dunn Chemist) – 590-592 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RU
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 28th November 2000.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 590/592 Eglinton Street, Glasgow, G5 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th June 2022.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out in the minute, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.22 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to had an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
G11 to G20 Applications
Buchanan & Campbell – Unit 5, Crow Road, West End Retail Park, Glasgow G11 6RY
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 15th June 2000.
That the granting of the application was desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Unit 5 West End Retail Park, Crow Road, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Boots The Chemist – Unit 5, Crow Road, West End Retail Park, Glasgow G11 6RY
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st June 2001.
That the granting of the application was desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Unit 5 West End Retail Park, Crow Road, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th October 2005.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed
Boots The Chemist – 50 Crow Road, West End Retail Park, Glasgow G11 7RY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 17th November 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 50 Crow Road, Glasgow G11.7 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 33-35 Bank Street, Glasgow G12 8ND
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th April 2000.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 33/35 Bank Street, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 15th June 2000.
That the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 1 Kirklee Road, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be not granted.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th October 2000.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 156 Dorchester Avenue, Glasgow G12.0 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Apple Pharmacy – Level 1, Hillhead Street, The Hub Complex, University Of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 65 Hillhead Street, Level 1, Fraser Building, University Of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 31st March 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 65 Hillhead Street, Level 1, Fraser Building, University Of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th April 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 14th March 2013.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicants were neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 16th June 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th June 2005.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary. or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 10 Yokermill Road, Glasgow G13.4 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
New Age Healthcare Ltd – 37 Glenkirk Drive, Glasgow G15 6BS
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th December 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th April 2000.
That the granting of the application was necessary and desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 8 Rozelle Avenue, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 8th February 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Lloydspharmacy Ltd – Unit 3a, Hopehill Road, Glasgow G20 7JN
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 11th May 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 351 Bilsland Drive, Glasgow G20 9RE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th August 2005.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the majority decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Apple Healthcare Group – 331 Bilsland Drive, Ruchill, Glasgow G20 9RE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th February 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 3331 Bilsland Drive, Glasgow G20.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th February 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 351 Bilsland Drive, Glasgow G20.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th April 2022.
In determining this application, the PPC was required to take into account all relevant factors concerning the definition of the neighbourhood served and the adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in the context of Regulation 5(10).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.15 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to had an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 12th May 2016 (Re-sit on the 28th November 2016).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraph 7.2 in PPC/INCL03/2016) and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
G21 to G40 Applications
Mr Andrew McMurdo & Ms Lisa Fergusson – 1 Fountainwell Square, K.A.T.S. Building, Glasgow G21 1RB
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st October 2014.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood was currently inadequate. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood.
New Age Healthcare Ltd – 24 Quarrywood Avenue, Glasgow G21 3ES
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th January 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
T S McNee Ltd – 227 Wallacewell Road, Glasgow G21 3PR
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th May 2001.
That the granting of the application was necessary and desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 227 Wallacewell Road, Glasgow G21.3 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Tesco Stores Ltd – Codben Road, St Rollox Business Park, Glasgow G21 4
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th January 2002.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Tesco Stores Ltd, St Rollox Business Park, Cobden Road, Glasgow G21.1 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Ann & Colin Fergusson – 194 Petershill Road, Glasgow G21 4AL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th February 2006.
That determination of C&A Fergusson’s application be deferred until the April meeting or until such times as the Committee had received and had the opportunity to consider guidance from Central Legal Office in relation to this issue.
Ann & Colin Fergusson – 194 Petershill Road, Glasgow G21 4AL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the Contractor Services adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 194 Petershill Road, Glasgow G21.4 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22 6AZ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th October 2005.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22 6AZ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22 6AZ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th May 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
T S McNee Ltd – 194 Fernbank Street, Glasgow G22 6BD
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th May 2001.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 194 Fernbank Street, Glasgow G22.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 29th August 2016.
In considering this application, the Committee was required to take into account all relevant factors concerning the definition of the neighbourhood served and the adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in the context of Regulation 5(10).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraph 7.6 of PPC/INCL05/2016) and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – 52 Skirsa Street, Glasgow G23 5BA
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 52 Skirsa Street, Glasgow G23.5 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Boots UK Ltd – Unit 43, The Forge Parkhead, Parkhead, Glasgow G31 4EB
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th October 2014.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Mrs Carol Ann Burns – 1399 London Road, Glasgow G31 4PF
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on 10th June 2010
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Mr Mohammed Yousaf Ahmad – 328 Westmuir Street, Glasgow G31 5BY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 12th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Ms Elizabeth Blair & Ms Angela Mackie – 3 Budhill Avenue, Springboig, Glasgow G32 0PW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 22nd August 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the proposed premises of the Applicant was necessary in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services within the neighbourhood; it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be approved.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision.
Ms Angela Mackie, 3 Budhill Avenue, Springboig, Glasgow G32 0PW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 2nd April 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 3rd November 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
L Rowland & Co (Retail) Ltd – 275 Carntyne Road, Glasgow G32 6JP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 8th August 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 275 Carntyne Road, Glasgow G32.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
That the granting of the application was necessary to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking a relocation in the Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 1158 Shettleston Road, Glasgow, G32 7PQ for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 9th February 2022.
In determining this application, the PPC was required to take into account all relevant factors concerning the definition of the neighbourhood served and the adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in the context of Regulation 5(10).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.15 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to had an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Invercoast Ltd – 18 Grantlea Terrace, Sandymount Post Office, Mount Vernon, Glasgow G32 9JN
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at Sandymount Post Office, 18 Grantlea Terrace, Mount Vernon, Glasgow G32.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th October 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
The Committee unanimously agreed that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 6 Lamlash Cres, Glasgow, G33 3LH for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 6 Lamlash Crescent, Cranhill, Glasgow G33.3 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th November 2009.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th October 2017.
In considering the application, the Committee took account of all relevant factors concerning neighbourhood and adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located, in terms of Regulation 5(10).
It also took account of all information available to it, which was relevant to the application. For the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services to the neighbourhood was adequate, given the level of service currently being provided by existing pharmacy contractors located outwith the neighbourhood. It was therefore neither necessary nor desirable to grant the application. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 2nd March 2020.
In considering this application, the Committee was required to take into account all relevant factors concerning the definition of the neighbourhood served and the adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in the context of Regulation 5(10).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out in the minute, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10.7-10.11 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was adequate and, therefore, it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the Application be refused.
Mr Mark Godden, Baxter Healthcare Ltd – 2a Burntboom Court, Shotts Street, Queenslie Ind Est, Clinovia, Glasgow G33 4JB
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a unanimous decision the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was necessary and desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at Clinovia Ltd, 2A Burntbroom Court, Shotts Street, Queenslie Industrial Estate, Glasgow, G33 4JB for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted to provide services outwith those specified in the Model Hours of Service Scheme.
Boots The Chemist – Units 21 -23 Auchinlea Road, The Fort Retail Park, Glasgow G33 5AT
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
Unanimously that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at Units 21-23 Glasgow Fort Retail Park, Auchinlea Road, Glasgow, G33 5AT for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th March 2003.
That the granting of the application was necessary and desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 14 Barholm Square, Glasgow, G33 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th November 2003.
That the granting of the application was necessary and desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 11 Mossvale Crescent, Garthamlock, Glasgow, G33 5NZ for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – 9 Mossvale Crescent, Craigend, Glasgow G33 5NZ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 9 Mossvale Crescent, Garthamlock, Glasgow, G33 5NZ for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused as a pharmaceutical contract had been granted in November 2003 and was being currently held on the Board’s Provisional List for premises situated at 11 Mossvale Crescent.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises occupied by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List were adequate and therefore the application by the Applicant to open an additional pharmacy was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood. In these circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – Unit B6/7, The Glasgow Fort Development, Junction 10, Glasgow G34 9DL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 22nd January 2004.
That the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Unit B 6-7 The Glasgow Fort Development, Junction 10, Glasgow, G34. for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 20 Auchinlea Road, Glasgow G33.9
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was not necessary but was desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 2 Bain Street, Glasgow, G40 2LA for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted, with the proviso that the applicant increase the opening hours to comply with the Model Hours Scheme, which are defined as 9.00am to 5.30pm, Monday to Saturday, with the flexibility to allow up to 2 half days per week, one week day and a Saturday afternoon, from 1.00pm.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
G41 to G60 Applications
Mr Mohammed Khalik Jamil & Mrs Farhat Jamil – 219-221, St Andrew’s Road Glasgow G41 1PD
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th May 2016.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, the Committee was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at 15 Barrland Street, Glasgow, G41 1QH was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and, in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the Committee that the application be refused.
Mrs Carol Anderson – Unit 1 or 2, Pollokshaws Road, Glasgow G41 2
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th March 2003.
The Committee deferred this application for inclusion in the pharmaceutical list on the basis that Mr John Gilbride had appealed against the PPC’s decision of 23 January 2003 not to grant a pharmaceutical contract at 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow. The Committee therefore decided to defer Mrs Anderson’s application until the National Appeal Panel had decided on Mr Gilbride’s case.
M A Sheikh Properties Ltd – 455 Victoria Road, Glasgow G42 8RW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th November 2011.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served. The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List. In the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Mr Brendan J Semple & Mr James B Semple – 11 Fieldhead Square, Glasgow G43 1HL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a majority decision (three votes to one) the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 11 Fieldhead Square, Auldhouse, Glasgow, G43 1HL for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted. The Committee felt that the granting of this contract was desirable, though not necessary as no other pharmacies exist within the defined neighbourhood. The Committee also felt that the granting of this contract would not have a detrimental effect on the other pharmaceutical contractors in the area.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mrs Elizabeth Roddick – 10 MacLaren Place, Glasgow G44 3RZ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th September 2002.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 10 MacLaren Place, Glasgow G44.3 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Pri-Tam Health Care Ltd – 606-608 Boydstone Road, Thornliebank G46 8NF
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th June 2005.
In summary, the Committee concluded that the granting of an additional NHS contract for the premises to be situated at 606-608 Boydestone Road, Carnwadric, Glasgow G46.8, was not necessary or desirable in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were situated.
Mr Jim Rae – 3 Kennishead Road, Thornliebank G46 8NY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th March 2003.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 3 Kennishead Road, Thornliebank, Glasgow, G46 8NY for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 9th March 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary and desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammad Y Ahmad – Unit 4, Shieldhall Retail Park, Glasgow G51 4DJ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 29th April 2009.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 12th March 2020.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 12.1 – 12.10 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Mr Brendan J Semple & Mr James B Semple – 190 Mosspark Drive, Glasgow G52 1HL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th December 2004.
The Committee has noted the application from Semple & Semple, Glasgow, to provide pharmaceutical services from the above location. After discussing the proposal from Semple & Semple, Glasgow, the Committee have agreed to take no exceptions to the proposal.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 22nd November 2006.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary and desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Dr Saduf Riaz of Premichem Pharmacy Ltd – 343 Nitshill Road, Glasgow G53 7BL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th January 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th January 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 9th September 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 8th August 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 911 Darnley Mains Road, Glasgow G53.7 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th January 2002.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 205 Hamilton Road, Glasgow G72.7 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th April 2023.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out within the minute, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.19 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to had an additional pharmacy.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2005.
By unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 7/9 Rannoch Drive Glasgow G61.2 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Apple Healthcare Group – 2b Monreith Avenue, Bearsden G61 1NJ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 2b Monreith Avenue, Glasgow G61.1 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Following the National Appeal Panel Decision, the decision was deferred back to the PPC.
Apple Healthcare Group Ltd – 2b Monreith Avenue, Bearsden G61 1NJ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th December 2006.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Following a 2nd National Appeal Panel Decision, the decision was deferred back to the PPC.
Apple Healthcare Group – 2b Monreith Avenue, Bearsden G61 1NJ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th May 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st September 2000.
The PPC decided that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 165 Milngavie Road, Glasgow G61.2 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Boots UK Ltd – Unit 1b, Strathkelvin Retail Park, Bishopbriggs G64 2TS
Pharmacy Practices Committee meeting cancelled on the 23rd August 2010.
Boots UK Ltd – Unit 1b, Strathkelvin Retail Park, Bishopbriggs G64 2TS
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th October 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th November 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Brendan J Semple & Mr James B Semple – 63-65 Main Street, Torrance, G64 4EL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st February 2005.
The Committee unanimously agreed that the granting of the application was necessary and desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 63-65 Main Street, Torrance, G64 4EL, for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – Unit 1az, St John’s Way, Main Street, Twechar G65 9TA
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was necessary, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at Twechar Healthy Living & Enterprise Centre, Unit 1AZ, St John’s Way, Main Street, Twechar, Glasgow G65.5 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Mr N Ahmad – 10 Newdyke Road, Kirkintilloch G66 2PX
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was necessary and desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 10 Newdyke Road, Glasgow G66.2 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th January 2023.
The Committee concluded that there was no evidence provided to demonstrate any inadequacy of the existing pharmaceutical services to the defined neighbourhood.
In accordance with the procedure on applications contained within Paragraph 6, Schedule 4 of the National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Regulations 2009, as amended, the Committee, for the reasons set out in the attached document, considered that the pharmaceutical service into the neighbourhood to be adequate.
Accordingly, the decision of the Committee was unanimous that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services within the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the pharmaceutical list, and accordingly the application was rejected. This decision was made subject to the right of appeal as specified in Paragraph 4.1, Regulations 2009, as amended.
Mr Ross Ferguson – 9 Alexandra Avenue, Lenzie G66 5BG
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 17th February 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Ross Hugh Ferguson – 6 Campsie Road, Milton of Campsie G66 8EA
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
That the granting of the application was necessary to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 6 Campsie Road, Milton of Campsie, Glasgow, G66 8EA for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th September 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Razwan Shafi – 17 Busby Road, Glasgow G76 9BP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th November 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st September 2021.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 13 – 13.18 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Mr Denis Houlihan – Unit 2, Greenlaw Village, Newton Mearns, G77 6NP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 26th October 2009.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary and desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Rowlands Pharmacy – Unit 2, Greenlaw Village, Newton Mearns, G77 6NP
Rowlands Pharmacy
Address: Unit 2, Greenlaw Village, Newton Mearns, G77 6NP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st April 2011.
The PPC were satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it were the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Rowland, L & Co (Retail) Ltd – Unit 2, Greenlaw Village, Newton Mearns, G77 6NP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 23rd October 2012.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the Greenlaw Village premises of the Applicant was necessary in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services within the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in these circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be approved.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th April 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th July 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th October 2008
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th July 2009
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – 80 Dumbarton Road, Duntocher G81 1UG
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was desirable, though not necessary, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 80 Dumbarton Road, Duntocher, West Dunbartonshire, G81 1UG for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted as the pharmacy would serve the area of Duntocher and would not have a detrimental effect on the pharmacy located at Hardgate Cross in Clydebank. They also considered that the application be desirable as there were no other pharmacies located within the defined neighbourhood and the pharmacy users would find the new pharmacy easily accessible without the barrier of the busy road and junction located at Hardgate Cross.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 26th September 2019.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraph 12.8 above) and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th June 2017.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraph 12.8) and the level of service provided by the contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Apple Healthcare Group – 258 Faifley Road, Glasgow G81 5EH
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 258 Faifley Road, Faifley, Glasgow G81.5 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 290 Faifley Road, Faifley, G81 5EY for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Ms Angela Mackie – 290 Faifley Road, Glasgow G81 5EY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th May 2011
The PPC were satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it were the majority decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th August 2005
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 1 Duntiglennan Road, Glasgow G81.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st November 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the***.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary and desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood. I., It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be approved.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Apple Pharmacy – 10 Hillview Place, Glasgow G83 0QD
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th April 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 12th April 2016.
The committee was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mitchell and Pollock Ltd – 19 Brown Street, Balloch, Alexandria G83 8HJ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st July 2021.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10.7-10.11 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was adequate and, therefore, it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the Application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th March 2018.
Taking into account all of the information available, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 17.4-17.8 in PPC/INCL01/2018) and the level of service provided by the contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 11th September 2023
The Committee considered whether granting this Application was necessary in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in and to the Neighbourhood. The Committee agreed that it was necessary and desirable to grant the Application in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services within the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the pharmaceutical list, and accordingly the Application was granted. This decision was made subject to the right of appeal as specified in Paragraph 4.1, Regulations 2009, as amended.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27TH October 2021.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.19 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy.
It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
Mr Andrew Mooney – 19 Greenock Road, Bishopton PA7 5JW
19 Greenock Road, Bishopton PA7 5JW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th March 2016.
The Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at Unit 3, 19 Greenock Road, Bishopton, PA7 5JW was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
Last submission date for application was 24th July 2017, No application received; therefore file was closed.
Mr Edward McAnerney – 26 Corlic Street, Greenock PA15 3LJ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th February 2020.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined in Paragraphs 10.7-10.11 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and that it was therefore neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy at the proposed premises. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 14th December 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List. In the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
If you are interested in opening a new pharmacy in the community, please familiarise yourself with the current Regulations and associated documents using the links below.
If you require further information on the processes involved, please contact the Community Pharmacy Development Team at cpdt@ggc.scot.nhs.uk, or call Monday to Friday, 9.00am to 5.00pm 0141 201 6041 / 0141 201 6054.
Current Pharmacy Consultations
All views submitted will be incorporated into a Consultation Analysis Report (CAR) which will be taken into account by NHSGGC’s Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) which decides the outcome of an application.
A full explanation of the pharmacy applications process is also available at the Pharmacy Applications section.
We support people joining our various networks, and steering and strategy groups, on a range of topics. We aren’t always recruiting people to join groups, but we’re always happy to hear from people who want to take part.
Find out who we’re looking for and examples of our involvement groups and networks below.
Who do we want to hear from?
We’re keen to involve people interested in:
Making a difference to the care we provide
Working collaboratively with us and other members of the public
Using their recent experiences to improve services
Developing their skills and abilities
Learning about the latest changes within NHSGGC.
Groups and networks
Involving People Network
Become part of this growing network by signing up here to make sure you’re fully informed of the work going on across your board. Read how you can help shape the future.
Stakeholder Reference Group
Our Stakeholder Reference Group includes patients, carers, community group members, as well as third sector representatives.
What does it do?
The Group guides how we best communicate and engage about our work. It also:
Provides feedback on ideas to transform health and social care services
Develops information materials for the public, ensuring they’re helpful and understandable
Suggests and reports back to others on how we inform and engage more widely with the public.
How to join
Unfortunately, we’re not currently recruiting for our Stakeholder Reference Group. Join our Involving People Network for future updates on involvement groups and networks.
Our public involvement resources help staff to engage with patients, relatives, carers and local communities. This includes supporting teams to collect patient feedback, and involve people in improving and developing services.
We will regularly update our list of feedback and engagement resources with new content.
For further support, please contact Patient Experience and Public Involvement (PEPI) using the online form.
Patient and Public Experience of Using Co-production to Improve Health Services
This resource provides:
A short video by patients, community members and staff on the value of taking a co-production approach to improving local health services, from NHS North Cumbria CCG.
Experience level
Experience is required – please contact the PEPI Team.
We produce a yearly report about your feedback, comments, complaints and concerns. These reports include the number of comments we receive and examples of feedback resulting in change and improvement.
Welcome to NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde’s (NHSGGC) Engagement and Consultation page. Here you can view the engagement that has helped shape services and strategy across the Board. We’re committed to informing and involving you whenever we make changes, below are a number of ways you can be involved in this. This includes our current engagement opportunities as well as past projects that highlight how feedback supports services.
Ongoing Engagement
Mental Health Services Engagement
Services to help people with their mental health are being redesigned to enable us to respond and better support people experiencing mental illness. Click the button below to share your experience of Mental Health services in NHSGGC.
If you are interested in opening a New Pharmacy in the community, please familiarise yourself with the current Regulations and associated documents using the button found below.
Building on work during 2022/23 the PEPI Team supported maternity services to carry out further enga…
Medicine Waste – Scottish Practice, Pharmacy and Prescribing Advisers Conference
Congratulations to NHSGGC Pharmacy Services, West Dunbartonshire HSCP Primary Care Pharmacy Team and the Patient Experience Public Involvement Team who were recognised as first prize winners at the Scottish Practice, Pharmacy and Prescribing Advisers Conference on the 22nd November 2024. Their research into public behaviours and solutions regarding overprescribing, the supply of medicines, and waste management has been invaluable and has helped inform a board-wide communication campaign. Lead author of the poster and Lead Pharmacist for Primary Care Anne Thomson (not pictured) said ‘we were delighted that over 1250 people took time to respond to our survey and share their feedback, experiences and ideas for change. This has given us valuable insight into what we can all do to improve how medicines are managed and reduce unnecessary medicines overprescribing and waste’.
NHSGGC also scooped the second poster prize for an innovative programme of education sessions delivered by pharmacy technicians for COPD patients; congratulations to NHSGGC Pharmacy Services, Glasgow City HSCP (South) and the West of Scotland Innovation Hub.
Julieanne Lock, Advanced Pharmacist, Primary Care with the winning poster
Video of Laura Patterson, Project Midwife for ‘Best Start Initiative’
Laura Patterson, Project Midwife, tells us about the ‘Best Start Initiative’, highlighting how engagement with service users and the public has helped shape the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Maternity and Neonatal Strategy.
Thank you Laura for showcasing this project within the wider Maternity Services.
Development of the Princess Royal Maternity Alongside Midwife Unit
Video of Nicola O’Brien, Project Midwife for the ‘Best Start Initiative’
Nicola, Project Midwife, tells us about the engagement that has gone into the development of the PRM AMU, as well as the engagement behind the Birthing Suites within the unit.
Thank you to Nicola for showing how service user engagement has helped shape Maternity services within NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
If you’ve used any of our services and would like to share your personal experience, you can do so on Care Opinion.
Involving People Network
We frequently send out updates on major news stories we have shared with the media and across our social media channels via our Involving People Network (IPN).
You can become a part of this growing network by signing up here to make sure you’re fully informed of the work going on across your board.
Please note, as part of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) we will not pass your personal details onto any third parties.
We design and deliver services by listening to the people receiving our care. Your views and experiences inform both the way we work and the quality of that work.
We offer you a number of ways to have your say, from one-off surveys, to longer term participation in networks. This allows us to hear from a range of voices, gather new ideas and learn about what’s important to you.
We use cookies to analyse traffic to our site and to enable certain functions such as forms and YouTube videos. These do not collect personal information. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies, or you can customise the options.
This website uses cookies
Websites store cookies to enhance functionality and personalise your experience. You can manage your preferences, but blocking some cookies may impact site performance and services.
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
Name
Description
Duration
Cookie Preferences
This cookie is used to store the user's cookie consent preferences.
30 days
CloudFlare provides web performance and security solutions, enhancing site speed and protecting against threats.
Sequence rules uses cookies to track the order of requests a user has made and the time between requests and makes them available via Cloudflare Rules. This allows you to write rules that match valid or invalid sequences. The specific cookies used to validate sequences are called sequence cookies.
session
cf_ob_info
The cf_ob_info cookie provides information on: The HTTP Status Code returned by the origin web server. The Ray ID of the original failed request. The data center serving the traffic
session
cf_chl_rc_m
These cookies are for internal use which allows Cloudflare to identify production issues on clients.
session
__cfruid
Used by the content network, Cloudflare, to identify trusted web traffic.
session
__cf_bm
Cloudflare's bot products identify and mitigate automated traffic to protect your site from bad bots. Cloudflare places the __cf_bm cookie on End User devices that access Customer sites that are protected by Bot Management or Bot Fight Mode. The __cf_bm cookie is necessary for the proper functioning of these bot solutions.
session
__cflb
When enabling session affinity with Cloudflare Load Balancer, Cloudflare sets a __cflb cookie with a unique value on the first response to the requesting client. Cloudflare routes future requests to the same origin, optimizing network resource usage. In the event of a failover, Cloudflare sets a new __cflb cookie to direct future requests to the failover pool.
session
_cfuvid
The _cfuvid cookie is only set when a site uses this option in a Rate Limiting Rule, and is only used to allow the Cloudflare WAF to distinguish individual users who share the same IP address.
session
cf_clearance
Whether a CAPTCHA or Javascript challenge has been solved.
session
cf_use_ob
The cf_use_ob cookie informs Cloudflare to fetch the requested resource from the Always Online cache on the designated port. Applicable values are: 0, 80, and 443. The cf_ob_info and cf_use_ob cookies are persistent cookies that expire after 30 seconds.
session
__cfwaitingroom
The __cfwaitingroom cookie is only used to track visitors that access a waiting room enabled host and path combination for a zone. Visitors using a browser that does not accept cookies cannot visit the host and path combination while the waiting room is active.
session
cf_chl_rc_i
These cookies are for internal use which allows Cloudflare to identify production issues on clients.
session
cf_chl_rc_ni
These cookies are for internal use which allows Cloudflare to identify production issues on clients.
