G1 to G10 Applications
Mr Andrew McMurdo & Ms Lisa Fergusson – 1 Fountainwell Square, K.A.T.S. Building, Glasgow G1 1RB
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st October 2014.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood was currently inadequate.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Asgher Mohammed – Unit 4, 170 High Street, Glasgow G1 1QL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th December 2006.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of additional pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Boots the Chemist – Dundas Street, Queen Street Station, Glasgow G1 2AF
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 17th April 2003
That the granting of the application was desirable, though not necessary, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Queen Street Station, Dundas Street, Glasgow, G1 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Boots The Chemist – Dundas Street, Glasgow G1 2AF
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th November 2003.
That the granting of the application was desirable, though not necessary, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Queen Street Station, Dundas Street, Glasgow, G1 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Lloydspharmacy Ltd – Unit 3, 130 Gallowgate, Glasgow G1 5AE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th June 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Eggle Ltd, 199 Gallowgate, Glasgow G1 5DY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 11th December 2012.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel remitted back to the PPC.
Re-heard by the PPC on the 31st October 2013
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Rajinder Singh, 81 St George’s Road, Glasgow G3 6JA
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 81 St George’s Road, Charing Cross, Glasgow, G3 6JA for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused. The Committee noted there existed an adequate pharmaceutical service within the area, with three pharmacies located in the defined neighbourhood and fourteen within a one mile radius. The Committee noted that the pharmacies located in the defined neighbourhood offered Supervised Methadone Administration Scheme, Domiciliary Oxygen Therapy and Advice to Nursing Home services and that the overall level of service provide by pharmacies was already adequate.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Gazenfer Ali of Vitalis Healthcare Ltd, 59 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6QX
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th September 2012.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Gazenfer Ali of Vitalis Healthcare Ltd, 59 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6QX
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 3rd June 2013.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served. There was room for improvement in the marketing and communication of the availability of translation services, which was being addressed, but the service was there and was being provided.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Ms Farzana Rasool & Mr Aziz Rasool, 111 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6RU
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th April 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision.
Ms Farzana Rasool & Mr Aziz Rasool, 111 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6RU
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 16th October 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision.
Ms Farzana Rasool & Mr Aziz Rasool, 111 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6RU
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st September 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances. it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Salman Shaikh, 1066 Argyle Street, Glasgow G3 8LY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th September 2002.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 1066 Argyle Street, Glasgow G3.8 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Apple Healthcare Group, 1056 Argyle Street, Glasgow G3 8LY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th February 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 1056 Argyle Street, Glasgow G3.8 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Lisa Christie – LG Pharmacy Ltd, Unit 12, 19 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 2nd May 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision.
Mr A Manzoor & Ms Amina Al-Adhami – 5/7 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 8th August 2007.
The PPC agreed to postpone consideration of the application from Mr A Manzoor and Ms Amina al-Adhami until the National Appeals Panel had made a determination on LG Pharmacy Ltd’s application.
Mr A Manzoor & Ms Amina Al-Adhami – 5/7 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 16th October 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Lisa Christie – LG Pharmacy Ltd, Unit 12, 19 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 26th February 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Ian Robert Mouat – 11 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 16th December 2009
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Ms Humyra Ahmed & Mr Ahmed Manzoor – 5/7 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th August 2017.
In considering the application, the Committee took account of all relevant factors concerning neighbourhood and adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located, in terms of Regulation 5(10).
It also took account of all information available to it, which was relevant to the application. For the reasons set out in the minute, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood was adequate, given the level of service currently being provided by existing pharmacy contractors located outwith the neighbourhood. It was therefore neither necessary nor desirable to grant the application. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Ms Tajinderjit K Sandhu – Unit 12, 42-46, New City Road, New City Road, Glasgow G4 9JT
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th October 2000
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Unit 12, 42-44 New City Road, Glasgow G4.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Dr Saduf Riaz of Premichem Pharmacy Ltd – Untit E, Morrison Street, Kingston Quay, Glasgow G5
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 8th August 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Houlihan Pharmacy Ltd – Unit 2, Block 0, 34 Elmfoot Grove, Oatlands, Glasgow G5 0LR
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 28th September 2019.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out in the minute, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10.7-10.11 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Ramis Qureshi – Unit 476, 32 Elmfoot Grove, Oatlands, Glasgow, G5 0LR
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th November 2024.
Taking account of all the representations made, and the information revealed by the CAR and submitted orally and in writing the Committee determines that it is neither necessary nor desirable to approve the application by Ramis Qureshi for admission to the Pharmaceutical List.
Mr Ameen Mohammed & Mr Rashid Mohammed – 460 Ballater Street, Glasgow G5 0QW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th January 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the majority decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Ameen – 460 Ballater Street, Glasgow G5 0QW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th April 2012.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Remitted back to board
Mr Ameen Mohammed – 460 Ballater Street, Glasgow G5 0QW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 28th November 2012.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeal Panel Decision, remitted back to the Board.
Mr Ameen Mohammed – 460 Ballater Street, Glasgow G5 0QW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th September 2013.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set in the minute, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr C M Razwan Shafi – 34 Bridge Street, Glasgow G5 9HU
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st February 2005.
The Committee agreed that the granting of the application was not necessary. A majority decision by the Committee members agreed that the granting of the application was highly desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 34 Bridge Street, Glasgow, G5 9HU for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Dr Saduf Riaz of Premichem Pharmacy Ltd – 151 Oxford Street, Glasgow G5 9JE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th March 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Denis F Houlihan – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 15th February 2001.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Patrick Gilbride – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 15th February 2001.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr John Gilbride – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th September 2001.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr John Gilbride – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st November 2002.
That decision on the application be deferred, and an oral hearing arranged. Additionally, that further supplementary information be made available to the Committee for their next meeting.
Deferred and an oral hearing scheduled.
Mr John Gilbride – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 23rd January 2003.
It was a majority decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mrs Carol F Anderson – 672 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th September 2003.
In the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 672 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th August 2005.
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL09/2005)
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the majority decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Ms Suman Barhaya – 672 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 672 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL10/2006)
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Ameen – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 29th March 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th January 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Adill Sheikh of Albert Cross Ltd – 672 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 2nd April 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Ameen – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 26th March 2009.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mrs Carol F Anderson (T/A L B Dunn Chemist) – 590-592 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RU
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th October 2000.
Deferred and an oral hearing scheduled.
Mrs Carol F Anderson (T/A L B Dunn Chemist) – 590-592 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RU
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 28th November 2000.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 590/592 Eglinton Street, Glasgow, G5 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Eglinton Healthcare Ltd – 433 Eglinton Street, Glasgow, G5 9RU
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th June 2022.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out in the minute, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.22 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to had an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
G11 to G20 Applications
Buchanan & Campbell – Unit 5, Crow Road, West End Retail Park, Glasgow G11 6RY
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 15th June 2000.
That the granting of the application was desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Unit 5 West End Retail Park, Crow Road, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Boots The Chemist – Unit 5, Crow Road, West End Retail Park, Glasgow G11 6RY
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st June 2001.
That the granting of the application was desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Unit 5 West End Retail Park, Crow Road, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Boots The Chemist – 50 Crow Road, West End Retail Park, Glasgow G11 7RY
Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL12/2005)
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th October 2005.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed
Boots The Chemist – 50 Crow Road, West End Retail Park, Glasgow G11 7RY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 17th November 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 50 Crow Road, Glasgow G11.7 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 33-35 Bank Street, Glasgow G12 8ND
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th April 2000.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 33/35 Bank Street, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
New Kirk Pharmacy Ltd – 1 Kirklee Road, Glasgow G12 0RL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 15th June 2000.
That the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 1 Kirklee Road, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be not granted.
Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL06/2000)
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 156 Dorchester Avenue, Glasgow G12 0DZ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th October 2000.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 156 Dorchester Avenue, Glasgow G12.0 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Apple Pharmacy – Level 1, Hillhead Street, The Hub Complex, University Of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 65 Hillhead Street, Level 1, Fraser Building, University Of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 31st March 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 65 Hillhead Street, Level 1, Fraser Building, University Of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th April 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Avind Salwan & Mr Neeraj Salwan – 65 Hillhead Street, Level 1, Fraser Building, University Of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 14th March 2013.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicants were neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Sinclair Shops Ltd – Rotherwood Avenue, Blairdardie, Glasgow G13 2AY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 16th June 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Olayinka Ogunnoiki – 10 Yokermill Road, Glasgow G13 4PU
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th June 2005.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary. or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 10 Yokermill Road, Glasgow G13.4 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
New Age Healthcare Ltd – 37 Glenkirk Drive, Glasgow G15 6BS
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th December 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Joyce Morrison Ltd – 8 Rozelle Avenue, Glasgow G15 7QR
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th April 2000.
That the granting of the application was necessary and desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 8 Rozelle Avenue, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Sinclair Shops Ltd – 1927 Maryhill Road, Glasgow G20 0BX
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 8th February 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Lloydspharmacy Ltd – Unit 3a, Hopehill Road, Glasgow G20 7JN
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 11th May 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 351 Bilsland Drive, Glasgow G20 9RE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th August 2005.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the majority decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Apple Healthcare Group – 331 Bilsland Drive, Ruchill, Glasgow G20 9RE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th February 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 3331 Bilsland Drive, Glasgow G20.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr M Rashid – 351 Bilsland Drive, Ruchill, Glasgow G20 9RE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th February 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 351 Bilsland Drive, Glasgow G20.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
DS Pharm Ltd – 261 – 263 Bilsland Drive, Ruchill, Glasgow G20 9RE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th April 2022.
In determining this application, the PPC was required to take into account all relevant factors concerning the definition of the neighbourhood served and the adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in the context of Regulation 5(10).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.15 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to had an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
CD Chem Limited – 261 – 263 Bilsland Drive, Ruchill, Glasgow G20 9RE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 12th May 2016 (Re-sit on the 28th November 2016).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraph 7.2 in PPC/INCL03/2016) and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
- Consultation Analysis Report
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL03/2016 )
- National Appeal Panel – Decison 1
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (Re-sit 28th November 2016)
- National Appeal Panel Decision 2
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
G21 to G40 Applications
Mr Andrew McMurdo & Ms Lisa Fergusson – 1 Fountainwell Square, K.A.T.S. Building, Glasgow G21 1RB
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st October 2014.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood was currently inadequate.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood.
No appeal received; File closed.
New Age Healthcare Ltd – 24 Quarrywood Avenue, Glasgow G21 3ES
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th January 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
T S McNee Ltd – 227 Wallacewell Road, Glasgow G21 3PR
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th May 2001.
That the granting of the application was necessary and desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 227 Wallacewell Road, Glasgow G21.3 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Tesco Stores Ltd – Codben Road, St Rollox Business Park, Glasgow G21 4
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th January 2002.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Tesco Stores Ltd, St Rollox Business Park, Cobden Road, Glasgow G21.1 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Ann & Colin Fergusson – 194 Petershill Road, Glasgow G21 4AL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th February 2006.
That determination of C&A Fergusson’s application be deferred until the April meeting or until such times as the Committee had received and had the opportunity to consider guidance from Central Legal Office in relation to this issue.
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL/14/2005)
Deferred, and an oral hearing to be arranged.
Ann & Colin Fergusson – 194 Petershill Road, Glasgow G21 4AL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the Contractor Services adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 194 Petershill Road, Glasgow G21.4 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22 6AZ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th October 2005.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22 6AZ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
T S McNee Ltd – 194 Fernbank Street, Glasgow G22 6BD
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 15th February 2001.
That consideration of the application be deferred until clarification is sought regarding the leasing of the premises.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22 6AZ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th May 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
T S McNee Ltd – 194 Fernbank Street, Glasgow G22 6BD
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th May 2001.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 194 Fernbank Street, Glasgow G22.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Vishal Sood – 701 – 703 Balmore Road, Glasgow G22 6QT
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 29th August 2016.
In considering this application, the Committee was required to take into account all relevant factors concerning the definition of the neighbourhood served and the adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in the context of Regulation 5(10).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraph 7.6 of PPC/INCL05/2016) and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
- Consultation Analysis Report
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL05/2016)
- National Appeal Panel Decision
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – 52 Skirsa Street, Glasgow G23 5BA
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 52 Skirsa Street, Glasgow G23.5 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Boots UK Ltd – Unit 43, The Forge Parkhead, Parkhead, Glasgow G31 4EB
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th October 2014.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mrs Carol Ann Burns – 1399 London Road, Glasgow G31 4PF
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on 10th June 2010
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Mohammed Yousaf Ahmad – 328 Westmuir Street, Glasgow G31 5BY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 12th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Ms Elizabeth Blair & Ms Angela Mackie – 3 Budhill Avenue, Springboig, Glasgow G32 0PW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 22nd August 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the proposed premises of the Applicant was necessary in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services within the neighbourhood; it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be approved.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision.
Ms Angela Mackie, 3 Budhill Avenue, Springboig, Glasgow G32 0PW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 2nd April 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Ms Angela Mackie – 3 Budhill Avenue, Springboig, Glasgow G32 0PW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 3rd November 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
L Rowland & Co (Retail) Ltd – 275 Carntyne Road, Glasgow G32 6JP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 8th August 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 275 Carntyne Road, Glasgow G32.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
National Co-Operative Chemists Ltd – 1158 Shettleston Road, Glasgow G32 7PQ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
That the granting of the application was necessary to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking a relocation in the Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 1158 Shettleston Road, Glasgow, G32 7PQ for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Rightdose Healthcare Ltd – 390 Ardgay Street, Sandyhills, Glasgow, G32 9EE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 9th February 2022.
In determining this application, the PPC was required to take into account all relevant factors concerning the definition of the neighbourhood served and the adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in the context of Regulation 5(10).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.15 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to had an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Invercoast Ltd – 18 Grantlea Terrace, Sandymount Post Office, Mount Vernon, Glasgow G32 9JN
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at Sandymount Post Office, 18 Grantlea Terrace, Mount Vernon, Glasgow G32.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 125 Robroyston Road, Glasgow G33 1HT
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th October 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 6 Lamlash Crescent, Cranhill, Glasgow G33 3LQ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
The Committee unanimously agreed that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 6 Lamlash Cres, Glasgow, G33 3LH for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 6 Lamlash Crescent, Cranhill, Glasgow G33 3LQ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 6 Lamlash Crescent, Cranhill, Glasgow G33.3 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr David Liston – 6 Lamlash Crescent, Cranhill, Glasgow G33 3LQ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Lloydspharmacy Ltd – Unit 6b Lamlash Crescent, Cranhill, Glasgow G33 3LQ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th November 2009.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Wellhouse Healthcare Ltd – 23 Newhills Road, Easterhouse, Glasgow G33 4HH
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th October 2017.
In considering the application, the Committee took account of all relevant factors concerning neighbourhood and adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located, in terms of Regulation 5(10).
It also took account of all information available to it, which was relevant to the application. For the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services to the neighbourhood was adequate, given the level of service currently being provided by existing pharmacy contractors located outwith the neighbourhood. It was therefore neither necessary nor desirable to grant the application. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Wellhouse Healthcare Ltd – 23 Newhills Road, Easterhouse, Glasgow G33 4HH
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 2nd March 2020.
In considering this application, the Committee was required to take into account all relevant factors concerning the definition of the neighbourhood served and the adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in the context of Regulation 5(10).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out in the minute, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10.7-10.11 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was adequate and, therefore, it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the Application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Mark Godden, Baxter Healthcare Ltd – 2a Burntboom Court, Shotts Street, Queenslie Ind Est, Clinovia, Glasgow G33 4JB
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a unanimous decision the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was necessary and desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at Clinovia Ltd, 2A Burntbroom Court, Shotts Street, Queenslie Industrial Estate, Glasgow, G33 4JB for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted to provide services outwith those specified in the Model Hours of Service Scheme.
No appeal received; File closed.
Boots The Chemist – Units 21 -23 Auchinlea Road, The Fort Retail Park, Glasgow G33 5AT
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
Unanimously that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at Units 21-23 Glasgow Fort Retail Park, Auchinlea Road, Glasgow, G33 5AT for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 14 Barholm Square, Garthamlock, Glasgow G33 5EE.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th March 2003.
That the granting of the application was necessary and desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 14 Barholm Square, Glasgow, G33 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 11 Mossvale Crescent, Garthamlock, Glasgow G33 5NZ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th November 2003.
That the granting of the application was necessary and desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 11 Mossvale Crescent, Garthamlock, Glasgow, G33 5NZ for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – 9 Mossvale Crescent, Craigend, Glasgow G33 5NZ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 9 Mossvale Crescent, Garthamlock, Glasgow, G33 5NZ for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused as a pharmaceutical contract had been granted in November 2003 and was being currently held on the Board’s Provisional List for premises situated at 11 Mossvale Crescent.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Assura Pharmacy Ltd – 63 Cumbernauld Road, Somerfield Supermarkets, Stepps, Glasgow G33 6NB
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises occupied by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List were adequate and therefore the application by the Applicant to open an additional pharmacy was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood. In these circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – Unit B6/7, The Glasgow Fort Development, Junction 10, Glasgow G34 9DL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 22nd January 2004.
That the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Unit B 6-7 The Glasgow Fort Development, Junction 10, Glasgow, G34. for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Wm Morrison Supermarkets PLC – 20 Auchinlea Way, Glasgow G34 9JJ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 20 Auchinlea Road, Glasgow G33.9
No appeal received; File closed.
P B Devlin Ltd – 2 Main Street, Glasgow G40 2LA
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was not necessary but was desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 2 Bain Street, Glasgow, G40 2LA for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted, with the proviso that the applicant increase the opening hours to comply with the Model Hours Scheme, which are defined as 9.00am to 5.30pm, Monday to Saturday, with the flexibility to allow up to 2 half days per week, one week day and a Saturday afternoon, from 1.00pm.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
G41 to G60 Applications
Mr Mohammed Khalik Jamil & Mrs Farhat Jamil – 219-221, St Andrew’s Road Glasgow G41 1PD
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Iain McDowall – 15 Barrland Street, Eglinton, Glasgow G41 1QH
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th May 2016.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, the Committee was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at 15 Barrland Street, Glasgow, G41 1QH was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and, in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the Committee that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mrs Carol Anderson – Unit 1 or 2, Pollokshaws Road, Glasgow G41 2
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th March 2003.
The Committee deferred this application for inclusion in the pharmaceutical list on the basis that Mr John Gilbride had appealed against the PPC’s decision of 23 January 2003 not to grant a pharmaceutical contract at 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow. The Committee therefore decided to defer Mrs Anderson’s application until the National Appeal Panel had decided on Mr Gilbride’s case.
No appeal received; File closed.
M A Sheikh Properties Ltd – 455 Victoria Road, Glasgow G42 8RW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th November 2011.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served. The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List. In the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Brendan J Semple & Mr James B Semple – 11 Fieldhead Square, Glasgow G43 1HL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a majority decision (three votes to one) the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 11 Fieldhead Square, Auldhouse, Glasgow, G43 1HL for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted. The Committee felt that the granting of this contract was desirable, though not necessary as no other pharmacies exist within the defined neighbourhood. The Committee also felt that the granting of this contract would not have a detrimental effect on the other pharmaceutical contractors in the area.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mrs Elizabeth Roddick – 10 MacLaren Place, Glasgow G44 3RZ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th September 2002.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 10 MacLaren Place, Glasgow G44.3 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Pri-Tam Health Care Ltd – 606-608 Boydstone Road, Thornliebank G46 8NF
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th June 2005.
In summary, the Committee concluded that the granting of an additional NHS contract for the premises to be situated at 606-608 Boydestone Road, Carnwadric, Glasgow G46.8, was not necessary or desirable in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were situated.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Jim Rae – 3 Kennishead Road, Thornliebank G46 8NY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th March 2003.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 3 Kennishead Road, Thornliebank, Glasgow, G46 8NY for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Kasim Gulzar – 1-3 Kennishead Avenue, Thornliebank G46 8PR
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 9th March 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary and desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammad Y Ahmad – Unit 4, Shieldhall Retail Park, Glasgow G51 4DJ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 29th April 2009.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Masood Ulhaq – 1195 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4PW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 12th March 2020.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 12.1 – 12.10 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Masood Ulhaq & Ms Aisha Ihsan – 1195, Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4PW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 12th March 2020.
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL03/2020)
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Brendan J Semple & Mr James B Semple – 190 Mosspark Drive, Glasgow G52 1HL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th December 2004.
The Committee has noted the application from Semple & Semple, Glasgow, to provide pharmaceutical services from the above location. After discussing the proposal from Semple & Semple, Glasgow, the Committee have agreed to take no exceptions to the proposal.
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL/14/2004)
- National Appeal Panel Decision
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File Closed
Mr Tejinder Bhopal – 50 Lyoncross Road, Glasgow G53 5UW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 22nd November 2006.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary and desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Dr Saduf Riaz of Premichem Pharmacy Ltd – 343 Nitshill Road, Glasgow G53 7BL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th January 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Farhat & Ramzan Ali – 1371 Barrhead Road, Crookston, Glasgow G53 7DA
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th January 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Advance Pharmacies Ltd – 26/28 Willowford Road, Darnley, Glasgow G53 7LP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 9th September 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Houlihan Pharmacy Ltd – 9-11 Darnley Mains Road, Glasgow G53 7RH
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 8th August 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 911 Darnley Mains Road, Glasgow G53.7 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd – Darnley Mains Road, Darnley, Glasgow G53 7RH
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th January 2002.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 205 Hamilton Road, Glasgow G72.7 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Sycamore Mill LLP – 500 Corselet Road, Old Darnley Mill, Darnley, Glasgow G53 7RN
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th April 2023.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out within the minute, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.19 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to had an additional pharmacy.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL01/2023)
- Consultation Analysis Report (CAR)
- National Appeal Panel Decision
National Appeal Panel remitted back to the PPC on 17th May 2024.
Re-heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th July 2024.
No appeal received; File closed.
G61 to G83 Applications
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 7-9 Rannoch Drive, Glasgow G61
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2005.
By unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 7/9 Rannoch Drive Glasgow G61.2 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Apple Healthcare Group – 2b Monreith Avenue, Bearsden G61 1NJ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 2b Monreith Avenue, Glasgow G61.1 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Following the National Appeal Panel Decision, the decision was deferred back to the PPC.
Apple Healthcare Group Ltd – 2b Monreith Avenue, Bearsden G61 1NJ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th December 2006.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Following a 2nd National Appeal Panel Decision, the decision was deferred back to the PPC.
Apple Healthcare Group – 2b Monreith Avenue, Bearsden G61 1NJ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th May 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 165 Milngavie Road, Glassow G61 3DY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st September 2000.
The PPC decided that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 165 Milngavie Road, Glasgow G61.2 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed
Boots UK Ltd – Unit 1b, Strathkelvin Retail Park, Bishopbriggs G64 2TS
Pharmacy Practices Committee meeting cancelled on the 23rd August 2010.
Boots UK Ltd – Unit 1b, Strathkelvin Retail Park, Bishopbriggs G64 2TS
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th October 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Sanjay Majuh – Unit F, Lomond Drive, Bishopbriggs G64 3BY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th November 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Brendan J Semple & Mr James B Semple – 63-65 Main Street, Torrance, G64 4EL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st February 2005.
The Committee unanimously agreed that the granting of the application was necessary and desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 63-65 Main Street, Torrance, G64 4EL, for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – Unit 1az, St John’s Way, Main Street, Twechar G65 9TA
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was necessary, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at Twechar Healthy Living & Enterprise Centre, Unit 1AZ, St John’s Way, Main Street, Twechar, Glasgow G65.5 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr N Ahmad – 10 Newdyke Road, Kirkintilloch G66 2PX
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was necessary and desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 10 Newdyke Road, Glasgow G66.2 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Aidan Connolly – Gleneden Court, Kirkintilloch Road, Lenzie, Glasgow G66 4LQ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th January 2023.
The Committee concluded that there was no evidence provided to demonstrate any inadequacy of the existing pharmaceutical services to the defined neighbourhood.
In accordance with the procedure on applications contained within Paragraph 6, Schedule 4 of the National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Regulations 2009, as amended, the Committee, for the reasons set out in the attached document, considered that the pharmaceutical service into the neighbourhood to be adequate.
Accordingly, the decision of the Committee was unanimous that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services within the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the pharmaceutical list, and accordingly the application was rejected. This decision was made subject to the right of appeal as specified in Paragraph 4.1, Regulations 2009, as amended.
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL04/2022)
- Consultation Analysis Report
- NAP Appeal Decision
File Closed.
Mr Ross Ferguson – 9 Alexandra Avenue, Lenzie G66 5BG
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 17th February 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Ross Hugh Ferguson – 6 Campsie Road, Milton of Campsie G66 8EA
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
That the granting of the application was necessary to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 6 Campsie Road, Milton of Campsie, Glasgow, G66 8EA for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 2 Old Gartloch Road, Gartcosh G69 8EU
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th September 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Razwan Shafi – 17 Busby Road, Glasgow G76 9BP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th November 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
NSJ Ltd, T/A Mearnskirk Pharmacy – 421 Mearns Road, Mearnskirk, Newton Mearns G77 5RY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st September 2021.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 13 – 13.18 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Denis Houlihan – Unit 2, Greenlaw Village, Newton Mearns, G77 6NP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 26th October 2009.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary and desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Rowlands Pharmacy – Unit 2, Greenlaw Village, Newton Mearns, G77 6NP
Rowlands Pharmacy
Address: Unit 2, Greenlaw Village, Newton Mearns, G77 6NP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st April 2011.
The PPC were satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it were the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Rowland, L & Co (Retail) Ltd – Unit 2, Greenlaw Village, Newton Mearns, G77 6NP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 23rd October 2012.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the Greenlaw Village premises of the Applicant was necessary in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services within the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in these circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be approved.
No appeal received; File closed.
Woodneuk Healthcare Ltd – 196 Cross Arthurlie Street, Barrhead G78 1EP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th March 2008
The Committee requested that an oral hearing of the application be arranged.
Woodneuk Healthcare Ltd – 196 Cross Arthurlie Street, Barrhead, G78 1EP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th April 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Tom McInally – 196 Cross Arthurlie Street, Barrhead, G78 1EY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 2nd March 2007.
The Pharmacy Practices Committee suspended this meeting.
Mr Tom McInally – 196 Cross Arthurlie Street, Barrhead, G78 1EY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th July 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Messrs Devanney & McFarlane – 30 Alexandra Street, Glasgow G81
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st March 2002.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Lloydspharmacy Ltd – Unit 5, 485-507 Glasgow Road, Clydebank G81 1JP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th October 2008
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. Reheard by the PPC on the 27th July 2009.
Lloydspharmacy Ltd – Unit 5, 485-507 Glasgow Road, Clydebank G81 1JP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th July 2009
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – 80 Dumbarton Road, Duntocher G81 1UG
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was desirable, though not necessary, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 80 Dumbarton Road, Duntocher, West Dunbartonshire, G81 1UG for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted as the pharmacy would serve the area of Duntocher and would not have a detrimental effect on the pharmacy located at Hardgate Cross in Clydebank. They also considered that the application be desirable as there were no other pharmacies located within the defined neighbourhood and the pharmacy users would find the new pharmacy easily accessible without the barrier of the busy road and junction located at Hardgate Cross.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – 80 Dumbarton Road, Duntocher G81 1UG
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th December 2004.
The Committee noted that this application had been withdrawn prior to the meeting. File closed.
BGR Healthcare Ltd – 258b Faifley Road, Glasgow G81 5EH
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 26th September 2019.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraph 12.8 above) and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
BGR Healthcare Ltd – 258b Faifley Road, Glasgow G81 5EH
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th June 2017.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraph 12.8) and the level of service provided by the contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL01/2017)
- Consultation Analysis Report
- National Appeal Panel Decision
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Apple Healthcare Group – 258 Faifley Road, Glasgow G81 5EH
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 258 Faifley Road, Faifley, Glasgow G81.5 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Faisal Khan & Yassir Shaheen – 290 Faifley Road, Faifley G81 5EY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 290 Faifley Road, Faifley, G81 5EY for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Ms Angela Mackie – 290 Faifley Road, Glasgow G81 5EY
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th May 2011
The PPC were satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it were the majority decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Invercoast Ltd – 1 Duntiglennan Road, Duntocher G81 6HF
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th August 2005
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 1 Duntiglennan Road, Glasgow G81.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Assura Pharmacy Ltd – 32a Brucehill Road, Dumbarton G82 4EN
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st November 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Invercoast Ltd – 32a Brucehill Road, Dumbarton G82 4EW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the***.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary and desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood. I., It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be approved.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Apple Pharmacy – 10 Hillview Place, Glasgow G83 0QD
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th April 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Sohail Healthcare (Scotland) Ltd – 8 Hillview Place, Alexandria G83 0QD
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 12th April 2016.
The committee was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL02/2016)
- Consultation Analysis Report
- National Appeal Panel Decision
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mitchell and Pollock Ltd – 19 Brown Street, Balloch, Alexandria G83 8HJ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st July 2021.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10.7-10.11 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was adequate and, therefore, it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the Application be refused.
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL01/2021)
- Consultation Analysis Report
- NAP Decision – NAP99 (2021)
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
PA1 to PA15 Applications
Brogan Healthcare Limited – 4 Blackford Road, Paisley PA2 7EN
Address: 4 Blackford Road, Pailsey PA2 7EN
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th March 2018.
Taking into account all of the information available, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 17.4-17.8 in PPC/INCL01/2018) and the level of service provided by the contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL01/2018)
- Consultation Analysis Report
- National Appeal Panel Decision
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
TC Trading (Scotland) Ltd – 4 Blackford Road, Paisley PA2 7EP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 11th September 2023
The Committee considered whether granting this Application was necessary in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in and to the Neighbourhood. The Committee agreed that it was necessary and desirable to grant the Application in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services within the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the pharmaceutical list, and accordingly the Application was granted. This decision was made subject to the right of appeal as specified in Paragraph 4.1, Regulations 2009, as amended.
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL02/2023)
- Consultation Analysis Report
- National Appeals Panel Decision
National Appeal Panel remitted back to the PPC on 12th June 2024.
Re-heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th June 2024.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Logan Gray Ltd – 23 Greenock Road, Bishopton PA7 5JN
23 Greenock Road, Bishopton PA7 5JN
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27TH October 2021.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.19 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy.
It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL03/2021)
- Consultation Analysis Report
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Andrew Mooney – 19 Greenock Road, Bishopton PA7 5JW
19 Greenock Road, Bishopton PA7 5JW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th March 2016.
The Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at Unit 3, 19 Greenock Road, Bishopton, PA7 5JW was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
- Pharmacy Practices Committee Minute (PPC/INCL01/2016)
- Consultation Analysis Report
- National Appeal Panel Decision
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Dears Pharmacy – 37 Church Street, Port Glasgow PA14 5EH
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the ***.
PA14 5EH – Dears Pharmacy, 37 Church Street, Port Glasgow
Last submission date for application was 24th July 2017, No application received; therefore file was closed.
Mr Edward McAnerney – 26 Corlic Street, Greenock PA15 3LJ
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th February 2020.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined in Paragraphs 10.7-10.11 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and that it was therefore neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy at the proposed premises. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received, File closed.
Arvinder Bilion & James Innes – 14 Barscube Terrace, Paisley PA2 6XA
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 14th December 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List. In the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received, File closed.